ROOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 6.77% compared to Root's net margin of 11.36%. Root's return on equity of 17.79% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.13%.

Root has a consensus price target of $105.20, signalling downside risk potential of -24.68%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.376, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.421%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Root quarterly revenues are $326.7M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Root's net income of $22.1M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $138.4M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.68x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 30.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.89x versus 4.83x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 6.77% compared to Root's net margin of -65.47%. Root's return on equity of 17.79% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Root has a consensus price target of $105.20, signalling downside risk potential of -24.68%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.885%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Root quarterly revenues are $326.7M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Root's net income of $22.1M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.68x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.89x versus 0.54x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 6.77% compared to Root's net margin of 4.73%. Root's return on equity of 17.79% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2%.

Root has a consensus price target of $105.20, signalling downside risk potential of -24.68%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.53%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Root.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Root quarterly revenues are $326.7M, which are larger than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Root's net income of $22.1M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.68x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 18.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.89x versus 1.91x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 6.77% compared to Root's net margin of 0.49%. Root's return on equity of 17.79% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Root has a consensus price target of $105.20, signalling downside risk potential of -24.68%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could grow by 49.59%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Root.

Root has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.33%.

Root has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Root pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Root quarterly revenues are $326.7M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Root's net income of $22.1M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Root's price-to-earnings ratio is 81.68x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Root is 1.89x versus 1.20x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.